I have grown up in an age where’t colloquial “activists” are everywhere. We live in a time where the meaning of becoming has needed a descriptively lending term to so be in concordance with the age that today is, so be it “activating.” The usual activists are coming to grips with the status quo by supposedly going against it, speaking out or standing in to “protest” or bring change that is what I would clarify “positively enacting new and proactive ways of being.”

It has become apparent to me that “deactivists,” are almost more important. It sounds to me, ‘cheeky; and that’s probably due in part to the grace in which verily it finds me. Though to consider in the splitting of roles, as it once was: seen ample to address an issue by channeling its activating- but I contend by the observation of a life that is constantly splitting and ever by the ordinary developing complexity… that there needs to be a greater awareness for’t people that operate in the negative.

In the envelope that this expression begins to create, I see individuals in my life that are in good taste solely as people that represent the last stands of passing norms and ideologically quivering by the face of a future that in progressive acknowledgement, look like the old guards. These guards are waiting for the nearly descending apocolypse upon them, as the wall’s caving in and hopeful tiding has gone wayward into realms of accepteance, psycholOgically seeking new interpretations -> their decaying modalities WITH faithful expos-e^a and other, usefully definitive means–to this life.